Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
AspiePedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Philosophical Investigations
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== II. Language‑Games == Formal Interaction Systems, Not Social Turn == '''Claim.''' ''Language‑games'' are '''formal interaction systems''': constrained moves with roles, materials, error‑states, and success‑criteria. Their point is not sociability; it is '''functionality''' (device‑and‑purpose). '''Evidence (primary).''' Wittgenstein catalogs games at §23 — “Giving orders, and obeying them… describing… constructing from a drawing… reporting… speculating” — explicitly to show that an expression’s sense is '''fixed by its employment''' in the activity Philosophical_Investigations . The “Water!” case (order vs. warning) and “Moses did not exist” (§79) as multi‑game sentence show that absent a game, a sentence '''does not yet say anything''' Philosophical_Investigations . '''Nachlass corroboration.''' De Queiroz assembles manuscript evidence that Wittgenstein '''never abandoned ‘calculus’ talk''': “operating with the word” (PI I, §559), “it plays a different part in the calculus,” and '''explicit notebook renderings''': “''If a sign is not used, it is meaningless… Signs that serve the same purpose are logically identical; signs that serve none are logically meaningless.''” (Ms‑notes, 1915; de Queiroz 2023) [P]. The Nachlass also carries the famous 1914 line: “''Um das Zeichen im Zeichen zu erkennen muß man auf den Gebrauch achten''” — “To recognize the symbol in the sign, one must '''pay attention to use'''.” (Ms 101, 23.10.14; de Queiroz 2023) [P]. '''Interpretation (TotalAutismo).''' * '''Tool‑mindset.''' The “words are tools” metaphor is not ornamental; it specifies '''design constraints''': each word/device has a use‑profile; misdeployment is a category error. * '''Purpose first.''' The Nachlass line “its meaning is its purpose” makes “meaning = use” a '''functional identity'''. (MS 107; de Queiroz 2023) [P]. * '''System boundaries.''' A game supplies '''public criteria''' (materials, moves), yielding the outward criteria Wittgenstein insists on (§580) Philosophical_Investigations . '''Primary citations.''' §23 (games list; use) Philosophical_Investigations <nowiki>;</nowiki> §79 (“Moses did not exist” depends on context) Philosophical_Investigations . '''Trait justification.''' Hyper‑systemizing, literalism, and device‑function thinking explain the '''desocialized precision''': the “social” enters only as '''rule‑contexts'''. ----
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to AspiePedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
AspiePedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Philosophical Investigations
(section)
Add topic